Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, especially large language models (LLMs), made it possible for an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image synthetic intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with numerous smaller firms have actually developed generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes throughout a broad variety of markets, consisting of software advancement, health care, financing, home entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and product design. [19] However, issues have actually been raised about the potential misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using phony news or deepfakes to trick or control people, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Copyright law concerns likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and imitate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its creation, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of creating synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these issues have formerly been checked out by myth, fiction and viewpoint given that antiquity. [23] The principle of automatic art go back at least to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where inventors such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having actually designed makers efficient in composing text, creating sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The custom of innovative automations has actually flourished throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s robot created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been utilized to model natural languages given that their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his very first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and analyzed the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin using Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is discovered on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The scholastic discipline of artificial intelligence was established at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced a number of waves of development and optimism in the years considering that. [31] Artificial Intelligence research study started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have actually used artificial intelligence to create artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and showing generative AI works produced by AARON, the computer program Cohen produced to generate paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative preparation were used in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI planning systems, particularly computer-aided process planning, utilized to produce sequences of actions to reach a specified objective. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems utilized symbolic AI methods such as state area search and constraint complete satisfaction and were a “fairly fully grown” technology by the early 1990s. They were utilized to generate crisis action prepare for military usage, [35] process prepare for producing [33] and decision strategies such as in prototype autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural webs (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of device knowing utilized both discriminative models and generative designs, to model and anticipate information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the introduction of deep learning drove development and research in image category, speech recognition, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this age were typically trained as discriminative models, due to the problem of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, developments such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks efficient in discovering generative designs, rather than discriminative ones, for complex data such as images. These deep generative models were the first to output not only class labels for images but likewise entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed improvements in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] resulting in the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), called GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize not being watched to various jobs as a Foundation model. [40]

The new generative designs introduced during this duration enabled large neural networks to be trained utilizing not being watched knowing or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the monitored knowing common of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning removed the requirement for human beings to by hand identify data, permitting bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, produced by an anonymous MIT scientist, was a totally free web application that could generate convincing character voices using minimal training information. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content development, influencing subsequent advancements in voice AI technology. [43] [44]

In 2021, the development of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which even more equalized access to high-quality artificial intelligence art creation from natural language triggers. [46] These systems demonstrated unmatched capabilities in generating photorealistic images, art work, and designs based on text descriptions, leading to prevalent adoption among artists, designers, and the basic public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT reinvented the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based jobs. [47] The system’s ability to take part in natural conversations, generate imaginative material, help with coding, and perform various analytical jobs recorded worldwide attention and sparked extensive discussion about AI’s possible effect on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another dive in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could reasonably be deemed an early (yet still insufficient) variation of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was contested by other scholars who kept that generative AI remained “still far from reaching the criteria of ‘basic human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI design integrating multiple techniques consisting of text, images, video, thermal information, 3D information, audio, and motion, paving the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI model available in 4 variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and announced plans for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, launching a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 family of big language designs, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs showed significant improvements in capabilities throughout numerous criteria, with Claude 3 Opus significantly exceeding leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated enhanced efficiency compared to the bigger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually emerged as a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents utilizing the innovation, going beyond both the global average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is further evidenced by China’s copyright developments in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, considerably exceeding the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by using unsupervised artificial intelligence (conjuring up for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine finding out trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend on the technique or type of the information set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For example, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language models). They can natural language processing, maker translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as foundation designs for other jobs. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language designs can be trained on shows language text, enabling them to generate source code for new computer system programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing premium visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are typically used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which demonstrated the ability to clone character voices utilizing just 15 seconds of training information. [67] The site acquired extensive attention for its ability to generate emotionally meaningful speech for various fictional characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial alternatives consequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music together with text annotations, in order to produce brand-new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a soothing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been created, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to imitate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t secured from regenerative AI yet, raising a dispute about whether artists should get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been developed that can be generated using a text expression, category options, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can create temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video clips. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the motions of a robotic system to produce brand-new trajectories for motion preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like “get blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage motions of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” models such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out primary reasoning in reaction to user prompts and visual input, such as selecting up a toy dinosaur when given the timely pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other things. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided design (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might also be established utilizing connected open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to help improve workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have been incorporated into a variety of existing commercially offered items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI designs are likewise readily available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI models with approximately a few billion parameters can work on smart devices, embedded devices, and individual computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion specifications) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can work on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with tens of billions of parameters can work on laptop or desktop. To attain an acceptable speed, models of this size might need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon products. For example, the 65 billion parameter version of LLaMA can be configured to operate on a desktop PC. [91]

The advantages of running generative AI in your area consist of security of privacy and intellectual home, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular concentrates on using consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such strategies as compression. That online forum is one of only 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model criteria. [93] Yann LeCun has advocated open-source models for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI safety. [95]

Language models with numerous billions of specifications, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, usually run on datacenter computer systems geared up with selections of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are usually accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced limitations on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.

There is totally free software application on the market efficient in acknowledging text produced by generative artificial intelligence (such as GPTZero), as well as images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for finding generative AI content include digital watermarking, material authentication, info retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both free and paid AI text detectors have regularly produced false positives, wrongly accusing students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and regulation

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to need all US business to report info to the federal government when training certain high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act consists of requirements to reveal copyrighted material utilized to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark created images or videos, guidelines on training data and label quality, constraints on individual data collection, and a standard that generative AI need to “comply with socialist core values”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, openly offered datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI designers have actually argued that such training is protected under fair use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair usage training have actually argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works offered to the public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can produce nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, several claims related to using copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has taken legal action against Stability AI over the use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York Times have actually sued Microsoft and OpenAI over using their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A different concern is whether AI-generated works can qualify for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works produced by expert system with no human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they lack human authorship. [116] However, the workplace has actually likewise begun taking public input to figure out if these guidelines need to be refined for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has raised issues from governments, businesses, and people, leading to demonstrations, legal actions, contacts us to pause AI experiments, and actions by multiple federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres specified “Generative AI has massive potential for great and wicked at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge global advancement” and contribute between $10 and $15 trillion to the global economy by 2030, but that its malicious usage “might trigger horrific levels of death and destruction, widespread injury, and deep mental damage on an inconceivable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have actually been arguments advanced by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computers really need to be done by them, provided the difference in between computer systems and human beings, and in between quantitative estimations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually led to 70% of the jobs for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI contributed to the 2023 Hollywood labor disagreements. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that “artificial intelligence positions an existential threat to imaginative professions” throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been seen as a possible challenge to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The intersection of AI and work issues amongst underrepresented groups internationally stays a vital facet. While AI assures effectiveness enhancements and skill acquisition, issues about task displacement and biased recruiting procedures continue amongst these groups, as detailed in surveys by Fast Company. To leverage AI for a more fair society, proactive actions include mitigating biases, advocating transparency, appreciating privacy and permission, and accepting varied groups and ethical factors to consider. Strategies include redirecting policy focus on regulation, inclusive design, and education’s capacity for personalized mentor to take full advantage of benefits while lessening damages. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI designs can show and amplify any cultural bias present in the underlying information. For example, a language model might assume that physicians and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases prevail in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image model prompted with the text “an image of a CEO” might disproportionately create images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased information set. A variety of techniques for reducing predisposition have actually been tried, such as altering input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep learning” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s likeness utilizing synthetic neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have gathered prevalent attention and concerns for their uses in deepfake celeb pornographic videos, revenge porn, fake news, scams, health disinformation, monetary scams, and hidden foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has actually generated responses from both market and federal government to detect and restrict their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically found that the popular generative AI models Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as images of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim women supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (dispersed journal technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and usage”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to produce controversial declarations in the singing style of celebs, public officials, and other well-known people have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In reaction, business such as ElevenLabs have actually stated that they would deal with mitigating potential abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The exact same software used to clone voices has actually been utilized on well-known musicians’ voices to develop tunes that imitate their voices, getting both remarkable appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar techniques have actually also been used to develop improved quality or full-length variations of tunes that have actually been dripped or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has actually also been used to create brand-new digital artist personalities, with some of these receiving adequate attention to get record deals at significant labels. [156] The designers of these virtual artists have likewise faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also creating artists which produce unrealistic or immoral appeals to their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI‘s capability to produce practical fake material has actually been exploited in various types of cybercrime, including phishing rip-offs. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been utilized to produce disinformation and scams. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos become perfectly realistic, they would stop appearing remarkable to viewers, potentially leading to uncritical acceptance of incorrect information. [159] Additionally, big language designs and other types of text-generation AI have actually been used to produce fake reviews of e-commerce websites to enhance rankings. [160] Cybercriminals have actually developed large language designs focused on fraud, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study revealed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, allowing assailants to acquire aid with hazardous demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have actually demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their security restrictions at low expense. [163]

Reliance on market giants

Training frontier AI designs needs a huge amount of calculating power. Usually just Big Tech business have the funds to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up buying access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have expressed issues about the environmental effect that the advancement and implementation of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large quantities of freshwater utilized for information centers, [168] [169] and high quantities of electrical energy use. [170] [166] [171] There is also concern that these impacts might increase as these models are incorporated into widely utilized search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as models require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation strategies include factoring potential environmental expenses prior to model development or data collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of information centers to decrease electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more effective machine learning designs, [168] [166] [169] lessening the variety of times that models need to be re-trained, [167] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the environmental impact of these designs, [168] [167] managing for openness of these designs, [167] managing their energy and water use, [168] encouraging scientists to publish information on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of topic professionals who comprehend both device knowing and climate science. [167]

Content quality

The New york city Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “inferior or unwanted A.I. material in social media, art, books and … in search engine result.” [172] Journalists have actually expressed concerns about the scale of low-grade generated content with respect to social networks material small amounts, [173] the monetary rewards from social media business to spread out such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical research paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover higher quality or preferred content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated content by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a snapshot of web pages, were device translated. Much of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were equated throughout at least three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had actually stopped updating the data for numerous factors: high costs for acquiring data from Reddit and Twitter, extreme focus on generative AI compared to other techniques in the natural language processing community, which “generative AI has contaminated the information”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools resulted in an explosion of AI-generated content across several domains. A study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely composed with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, around 17.5% of newly released computer technology papers and 16.9% of peer review text now include content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a similar trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that an average of 34 million images have been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been produced utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these produced by designs based on Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, defects in the resulting models may occur. [185] Training an AI model solely on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this process, where each new model is trained on the previous design’s output, causes progressive destruction and ultimately results in a “model collapse” after multiple models. [186] Tests have been conducted with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the worth of data collected from real human interactions with systems may end up being progressively important in the existence of LLM-generated material in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial information is often utilized as an option to information produced by real-world events. Such data can be deployed to verify mathematical models and to train maker knowing models while preserving user privacy, [188] including for structured data. [189] The method is not limited to text generation; image generation has actually been utilized to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been utilizing an undisclosed internal AI tool to write a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a phony AI-generated interview with previous racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had actually not made any public appearances considering that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing mishap. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover included the line “deceptively real”, and the interview consisted of a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter amid the controversy. [192]

Other outlets that have actually published articles whose material and/or byline have actually been validated or presumed to be developed by generative AI models – typically with false content, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – include:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism kept in mind that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had used generative AI to produce articles for a lot of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had actually produced tens of thousands of posts for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based on Generative AI models, prompting concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has historically been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, content developers or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically created anchors have also been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google reportedly pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to “produce newspaper article” based on input information provided, such as “information of existing events”. Some news business executives who saw the pitch described it as” [taking] for given the effort that entered into producing accurate and artistic newspaper article.” [224]

In February 2024, Google released a program to pay small publishers to write three short articles each day utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not need the understanding or permission of the sites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it require the published short articles to be labeled as being created or assisted by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have undergone cybersquatting, with short articles produced by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have revealed concern that generative AI might have a hazardous effect on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for try out generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies developing a reliance for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which summarizes news stories, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially further reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In reaction to potential risks around the usage and abuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about decreasing audience trust, outlets worldwide, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have released standards around how they prepare to use and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a survey of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by “primarily AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “primarily human with some help from AI”. The outcomes of international studies reported that individuals were more uncomfortable with news subjects consisting of politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer programming website

Technology website

Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with comprehensive abilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Expert system art – Visual media developed with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that simulates conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning approach
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of large language design
Large language design – Kind of maker knowing design
Music and expert system – Usage of synthetic intelligence to produce music
Generative AI porn – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is produced algorithmically rather than by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of details retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in device learning

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the initial on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative designs”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI laboratories warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, organizations, and federal governments”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse right now”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ battle versus AI, humans win (in the meantime)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI“. techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the effect of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems clash with copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, obtained October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York City, New York: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided process planning: the advanced study”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). A Self-governing Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI organizer based on the HSTS preparation structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a standard spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural component explicitly committed to world modeling (the mode identifier), and differentiate in between control and monitoring.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine learning: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Thorough Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are without supervision multitask learners” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with without supervision knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some type given that ’15. ai’ released in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates possible images of literally anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace human beings?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early explores GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that integrates six kinds of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-a powerful AI design it says can go beyond GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic reveals Claude 3, going beyond GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a fast brand-new AI design – and a creative new method to interact with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the original on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and threats of structure models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Buying Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the initial on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that just English voices are available.; Another major function of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “premium” certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s scientists outlined in a paper the ethical obstacles that they experienced around the development of generative AI designs like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer sparks dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design develop times with brand-new AI-driven part production method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as start-up Runway reveals brand-new design”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is simple. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, offered to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative artificial intelligence technologies such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of service software application … the brand-new A.I. functions, dubbed Copilot, will be offered in a few of the business’s most popular company apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature just got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a redesigned, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll be able to use generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) will end up being one of the most important functions for imaginative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and usage Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot today”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself maker or customize the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can create a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created locally, so you don’t need an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in your home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model in the house, you will require a computer build with an effective GPU that can manage the big amount of information and calculation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust 2 LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * safety and security” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to halt sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to strict U.S. export standards that limit how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 complimentary software application to identify fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We tested a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be impossible. That’s a big issue for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI material for safety, White House states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first guideline on synthetic intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU legislators choose tougher AI guidelines as draft relocate to final phase”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China says generative AI rules to apply just to items for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the original on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also accepting the technology”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York City Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office desires to hear what people think about AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking computer game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art market apparently annihilated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of sophisticated tech”. NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring an agreement that clearly demands AI policies to safeguard writers and the works they develop. … The future of generative synthetic intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to change labor-has become a vital sticking point for stars going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically referred to as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system presents an existential hazard to imaginative occupations, and all actors and entertainers deserve contract language that protects them from having their identity and talent exploited without consent and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the world are fretted about AI being a hazard to jobs”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are prejudiced. Can logic conserve them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and improving safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 showed the obstacles of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying high-tech porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech could start a global face-off”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Expert System Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ .2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to boost anti-U.S. impact campaigns, authorities state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus fake news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the difficulties of generative innovations: Proposing the combination of artificial intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has started”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, say experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to tackle deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to generate star hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake star audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI tunes that mimic popular artists raising alarms in the music market”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get prepared for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social networks platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ predicts the greatest threat is that deepfakes will ultimately become dull”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake evaluations: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI models open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it suggests for environment modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon effect of expert system”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological costs are soaring – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system scientist explains the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI model all of a sudden attempts to customize its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was workable and frequently identifiable. Large language models create text that masquerades as genuine language with intention behind it, even though there is none, and their output crops up everywhere,” she wrote. She gives the example that ChatGPT excessive uses the word “dig,” in a manner that people do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: approximating the frequency of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively produced information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Danger to A.I. Itself”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found mistakes in over half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was really AI“. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ utilizing AI“. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an USA Today site. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioning “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian local newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Transfer To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Pertaining to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, In Addition To Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI short article about females’s usage of fake tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of regional news sites is publishing AI-written posts under phony bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter captured utilizing expert system to produce fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated posts are permeating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will update AI function after inaccurate news notifies”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated speakers to read the news. The question is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s very first AI news anchor revealed in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Turned Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are surprised to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is currently attacking Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators warn AI could result in ‘damage’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta walked away from news. Now the business’s utilizing it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s technique to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A relative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.